Looking back
at my first and seventh blog posts, I stated that what I wanted to gain from
this course were better skills in writing, be able to write college level
papers, and be able write and come up with ideas to whichever topic I was given. Well I can sincerely say that I have learned
a lot this semester, I have learned how to better analyze essays, develop good
argumentative essays. I’ve had more practice in writing essays, I have learned
of good features that make a good essay. I have as well learned that in order to
create more credibility in your paper, I need to back up my ideas with info. Although
I think I have gained a lot of knowledge in writing papers this semester, I still
need to practice more and improve when it comes to using more complex
vocabulary. I have become more familiar with college level writing and have
learned of different important features of a good paper. Some weaknesses I need
to work on would be to be able to develop better thesis in papers, as well as
better organizing my ideas. I still need to work as well in trying to avoid
repetition throughout my essays.
Friday, April 27, 2012
Revisions assign.# 14
For my final portfolio I have chosen to revise my ad
analysis essay. In my opinion I was able to describe what the ad was trying to
tell its audience, and why the strange ad was able to get people’s attention. The
weaknesses of my paper were that I was not able to clearly state my thesis, and
I also repeated info. My strategy on how I plan to revise my essay is to make a
better explanation of the ad, and look carefully at each sentence to see if
they make sense. In my essay I was able to support some ideas. I feel as if I need
to work as well on a better explanation of the ad, some important facts where
left out. When writing my essay I am going to try to include better info to
support my claims. I am going to read each sentence out loud and see if they
make sense, then decide whether I need to fix them or erase them from my paper.
I will as well try to organize my ideas better, and make it clear and easy to
read.
Friday, April 13, 2012
Analyzing argument essay Assign.#13
When analyzing the article “Free Speech off Campus
Must Be Protected” I have learned of several ways in which a writer is able to
catch the reader’s attention and create credibility towards an essay. First of
all the article was very well organized and well-defended by the author. Having
good clear evidence and backing up your argument with it, in my opinion is one
of the best ways to write an argumentative essay. Good clear evidence and having
good strong reasons on your argument creates credibility towards your papers
and makes it hard for it to be challenged. A positive serious tone in a paper
also helps, it show confidence and gives the reader the idea that you know what
you are talking about and not just making stuff up. Being well organized with
your facts and ideas throughout the essay also makes the essay more easy to
read and understandable for the reader. In conclusion, I guess being well
organized, providing strong evidence and a good tone are some of the main
points that make a good essay.
Sunday, April 8, 2012
Assign.# 12 Evidence
Question: Should
stores that sell tobacco products be boycotted?
Thesis: Stores
that sell tobacco products should be boycotted, for selling a product that can
cause a deathly addiction.
Compelling evidence: My most compelling
evidence in my opinion would be the fact that tobacco can actually cause an
addiction which could be hard to get rid of, and which could lead you to your own
death. This is strong evidence because years of research have proven that
smoking can cause lung cancer and other diseases. A way in which I could cause
an emotionally appeal to my audience is in mentioning how even if they don’t smoke,
they should be aware of how much damage secondhand smoke could cause to their
loved ones. Because cancer is a very deathly disease and one in which people
are the most afraid of, I can use the fact that tobacco causes cancer throughout
my essay because it is my strongest reason.
Weakest evidence: I think my weakest
evidence or something that could be used to challenge my argument is that,
people could argue that they have the right to be able to buy this product. Although
people could argue that they should be able to smoke careless about their
health, they should also think about how they could still affect others because
of secondhand smoke. There could be different reasons in why people could be
against my argument, but in my opinion the fact it could lead people to their
death could be difficult to challenge.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)